Re: A89: Distubing assembler error

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Distubing assembler error
From: Daniel7073@aol.com
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 19:58:28 EST
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 11/30/1998 6:56:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
oh@hem.passagen.se writes:

> Interesting..  all code I have read uses positioning.. 
>  and A68K whomost 89-programmers on PC's uses, that one is using
positioning.
>  x86 do need thoose positions too.. (at least most.. there probably are som 
> weird
>  inline version that doesnt need to)
>  It is afterall up to the compiler/assembler
>  
>  To clarify..  what I meen with positioning is just what comasyouare here 
> told
>  us..  if something is in the first column, it is a label if not, it is an
>  instruction or an assemblerdirective...
>  
>  //Olle

Oh, well.  I guess I was wrong.  I just thought that was strange because Turbo
Assembler 1.0 (x86) never required it for when I used that.  If I confused
anyone on this topic, I'm sorry.

Daniel Imfeld

Prev: Re: A89: Starting out assembly, need help
Next: Re: A89: Check sum problem Really need help
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread