Re: A89: What is wrong with these stupid compilers?

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: What is wrong with these stupid compilers?
From: BLoWh0Le@aol.com
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 19:56:04 EST
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


i'm not sure, but try it without the .asm extension.  i usually just compile
using the asm89.bat that came with plusshell, and in that one you don't need
the ext.  i'm not sure about a68k though.

In a message dated 11/30/98 4:29:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
TurboSoft@aol.com writes:

<< How come, when l type 
 C:\...\>a68k program.asm
 OR 
 C:\...\>a68k program.asm
 all it says is that lt can't open the source file?
 it's in the same directory.  l can see it. >>

Prev: Re: A89: What is wrong with these stupid compilers?
Next: Re: A89: Util and Libs
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread