Re: A89: Question

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Question
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 20:04:30 +0200 (MET DST)
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <69d3a06c.35e7b8e2@aol.com>>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Yes I got it.  You don't need to send me the message to my ticalc.org
e-mail address, as you know I am on all the lists. :)

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Sat, 29 Aug 1998 TGaArdvark@aol.com wrote:

> 
> >> It's a ti-89 not 98
> > 
> > Hey dick head !!!
> > It was understood the message was refering to the ti-89.
> > Your message just flamed and did NOT help any !!!
> > Being so picky only shows that you are a Horse ass !!!
> 
> Ya get this, Bryan?  This might be a good chance to give
> the other lamers on the list an example of administrative
> authority.  IMHO, a letter like this shouldn't be tolerated,
> reguardless of the reason for writing it, (and there isn't
> even a reason in this case).
>

References:

From:

Prev: Re: A89: New memory question.
Next: A89: Key?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread