[A86] Re: Retrieving two bytes

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A86] Re: Retrieving two bytes
From: rabidcow@juno.com
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 22:03:40 -0700
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


the page $d function for _ldhlind is:
   call $0033
   ret

requires 2 more bytes on the stack, takes 27 extra cycles.
no other differences.  (well, requires page $d to be loaded)

-josh


On Sun, 1 Apr 2001 23:14:53 EDT Appelkore@aol.com writes:
> 
> Is _ldhlind slower than $0033? Is there a difference in registers 
> destroyed?
> 
> -- Jonathan Marcus
> Appelkore@aol.com
> 
> 
> 
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Follow-Ups:

[A86] Re: Retrieving two bytes

From: Ari Dinsmoor <lpari555@yahoo.com>

Prev: [A86] Re: Retrieving two bytes
Next: [A86] Re: Escape Time Algorithm
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread