Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]

Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]

• To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]
• From: "Steve" <comfortably_numb_@hotmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 19:33:01 -0600
• Disposition-Notification-To: "Steve" <comfortably_numb_@hotmail.com>
• References: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0011161255160.29431-100000@flood.OCF.Berkeley.EDU> <3A147CDD.2E700504@nmt.edu> <003501c0503b$ffe84ac0$1ecf5c18@mej>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

> Frankly, Assembly language is indentical to machine code in the same sense
> the letter A is indentical to its corresponding ASCII code. It isn't a

I thought that its only Assembly before you compile the source, ie

call $5371
ret

and after you only call it machine code...

CD7153C9

• Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]
• From: Patrick Davidson <pad@OCF.Berkeley.EDU>
• Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]
• From: Michael Perley <mperley@nmt.edu>
• Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]
• From: "Matt Johnson" <matt2000@dogtech.com>

• Prev: Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]
• Next: A86: Memory Problems
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread