Re: A86:OnTemp.asm

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86:OnTemp.asm
From: rabidcow@juno.com
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 19:24:20 -0800
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

well, you could catch that if you set up your own error handler, but that
wouldn't work if the basic program called any other asm progs.

-josh

On Sat, 15 Jan 2000 15:30:06 EST ComAsYuAre@aol.com writes:
>
>In a message dated 1/15/00 1:42:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
>rabidcow@juno.com writes:
>
>> because the only difference between stop and return is that stop 
>resets
>>  the op and fp stacks back to the base pointers.
>>  kirk said it would probly do something nasty, but i'm not sure how 
>and i
>>  don't know if anyone actually tried it.
>>  
>
>It gives an error 14 undefined when it gets to the line with the 
>"stop", 
>though it doesn't crash or anything.
>
>
>----
>Jonah Cohen
><ComAsYuAre@aol.com>
>http://linux.hypnotic.org/~jonah/ (down)
>

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Prev: Re: A86: Re: ouch, danny. that was harsh.
Next: Re: A86: (no subject)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread