Re: A86: Re: Thanx Glen

To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Thanx Glen
From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 19:07:57 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
References: <ee505a6.24c90b07@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


The last time I worked on it, the plugin produced .83p files that were
_exactly_ the same as the one's made by Movax's program.

>
> In a message dated 7/22/99 6:36:06 PM Central Daylight Time,
> ComAsYuAre@aol.com writes:
>
> > > IMHO, the 83 is easier for me because I owned that calc at the time I
was
> >  >  learning asm, and didnt have access to any emulators. The 86 isnt
> _easier_
> >
> >  > to
> >  >  program for than the 83, there just happens to be more knowledge of
the
> >  86,
> >  >  and resources for programming for it...
> >
> >  actually, that WOULD make it easier to program the 86 :-)
>
> Oh, I suppose youre right. dammit... =P  Well, the main point of my
message
> was to reply to David's. His 82/83 Plugin for Asm Studio 86 still doesnt
> work, well the last version I tried. How is the progress on that...?

References:

Re: A86: Re: Thanx Glen

From: Jkhum98@aol.com