Re: A86: Re: Re: Maskable Interrupts
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: Re: Maskable Interrupts
In a message dated 1/2/99 2:32:42 PM Eastern Standard Time,
assets@eden.rutgers.edu writes:
> >you could do that, but then the battery power would just be drained
> >incredibly. what's good about using halt is that it uses minimal battery
> >power
>
> that's not a problem, loop over a check for the on key _and_ a halt; you
> don't really need to check it more than 200 times a second anyhow
>
hey! sounds like a plan. would still take a bit more battery power, but
nobody would notice