Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
Session Start: Sun Dec 26 08:58:20 1999
[12/26/99,08:58:20] *** Now talking in #ti
[12/26/99,08:58:24] *** MrZ80 sets mode: +b *!*@*mich.net
[12/26/99,08:58:24] *** You were kicked by LinkPort (banned: Banned by
overwhelming consensus of channel operators)
[12/26/99,08:58:24] *** Attempting to rejoin...
Session Close: Sun Dec 26 08:58:35 1999
Hehe.. nope, doesn't look like it.
--
Bryan Rabeler
rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu
http://www.msu.edu/~rabelerb/
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - Lord
Acton
----- Original Message -----
From: <TGaArdvark@aol.com>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, December 27, 1999 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
>
> > I've been banned since August...
>
> Well, I FINALLY convinced them to clean out the banlist.
> Mostly 100+ day old unused bans (and AOL). But perhaps
> they unbanned you too. Like I said, I was against you (and
> just about anyone else) being banned. But I was...
> overruled. Bans are ONLY for people who disrupt the
> channel and can't be controlled otherwise. For this reason,
> I can't think of any explanation for a ban that's longer than
> 7 days old. Oh well.
>
>
References: