Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
Bryan you did exactly the same thing when you did file archives (not the
email part, the part about giving precedence to assembly) so I don't even
want to hear that from you. That's why I got stuck on the backup
filearchives job in the first place, because you'd let so many BASIC
programs build up =P
----- Original Message -----
From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
> Well, I assume that "cool" assembly games probably get top priority over
> there, and then next come other assembly stuff, and BASIC probably is only
> added when they have time. Seriously, I've been saying this and
complaining
> about this for months, glad someone also agrees with me about this e-mail
> thing. :) Your absolutely right, I also rarely get e-mails back from
> filearchive@ticalc.org. It seems like with 3 people over there doing the
> job I used to do by myself, they could _at least_ do as good of a job as I
> did, and maybe even better... :) But thats what you get when selfish,
> greedy, out-of-touch coordinators are making all the decisions.
>
> Bryan
Follow-Ups:
References: