Re: A86: Re: Re: Very[OT] A TI compiler - Why not?

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Re: Very[OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
From: ZeromusMog@aol.com
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 00:26:13 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 4/29/99 12:52:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
david_hd@yahoo.com writes:

> Hell, what about a JavaVM86?
>  That'd be something!

::Falls off of his chair laughing::
Yeah, on my 486/33, it shoulnd't be Java, it should be molasses. (Aren't I 
witty? :> )

I'd like to see the 86 try to run a 100MB spreadsheet java app... :P
(about as much as I'd enjoy watching contenental drift.)

Prev: A86: Re: [OT] RE: A TI compiler - Why not?
Next: Re: Re(2): A86: Re: SAT
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread