Re: A86: Re: SAT

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: SAT
From: warhorse <warhorse@bellatlantic.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 16:40:39 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
References: <BMSMTP92515548312a0734985@dpcmail.itg.ti.com> <37263C77.7C51@camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt><19990428.145058.6726.2.V8r@juno.com> <19990428.161122.11326.0.V8r@juno.com> <007a01be91e5$28881da0$3551c6d1@default>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

SAT math is stupidly easy, but it doesn't hurt to have a program to help check
your answer. Sometimes, though they ask you for all the factors of 100, and you
gotta use the asm factor program to speed things up.

Jarrod wrote:

> if you have half a brain, all you need are the basic functions of the
> calculator on the sat. The sat is possibly the biggest load of shit test you
> will ever take in your entire life. Have you taken any practice tests for
> the math part? They give you *every* function you would ever need to know at
> the beginning of *each* section. It is absurd and insulting that such a test
> could possibly have so much weight and could determine the path of a life so
> much.
>
>

References:

Re: A86: Not displaying "done" at end

From: Pat Milheron <pmilheron@ti.com>

A86: A TI compiler - Why not?

From: NSJ aka Viriato <nmasj@camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt>

A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?

From: Chris Magill <v8r@juno.com>

A86: SAT

From: Chris Magill <v8r@juno.com>

A86: Re: SAT

From: "Jarrod" <xero@sover.net>

Prev: Re: A86: [OT] RE: A TI compiler - Why not?
Next: Re: A86: SAT
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread