A86: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?

A86: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?

• To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: A86: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
• From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
• Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 23:37:46 -0500
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• References: <BMSMTP92515548312a0734985@dpcmail.itg.ti.com> <37263C77.7C51@camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt> <000b01be9132$40234c40$c152dfd1@david> <003501be91cd$f6d91e60$1151c6d1@default> <005501be91e6$feb2f840$b68159d8@david> <001901be91f5$9b7b0ba0$3551c6d1@default>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

Knowing another asm might have helped, but they are just plain great
beginners tutorials.  Have you seen his putsprite?  That's got to be about
the worst putsprite and find pixel ever!  And it's aligned, even!  But
there's no tricks, it's plain and simple.  It gets the job done, and anyone
with a little programming knowledge can pick it up.

> heheh, then maybe that is why they were so easy ;)
>
> tho maybe it also had something to do with me knowing a bit about x86 asm.
> who woulda thunk it?

• Re: A86: Not displaying "done" at end
• From: Pat Milheron <pmilheron@ti.com>
• A86: A TI compiler - Why not?
• From: NSJ aka Viriato <nmasj@camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt>
• A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
• From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
• A86: Re: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
• From: "Jarrod" <xero@sover.net>
• A86: Re: Re: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
• From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
• A86: Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
• From: "Jarrod" <xero@sover.net>

• Prev: RE: A86: Recruiting Programmers
• Next: Re: A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread