Re: A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
In a message dated 4/27/99 11:36:58 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
TGaArdvark@aol.com writes:
> > Perhaps you could make a new on-calc language, "anti-basic" or
> > something... It could be similar to the way basic is done now, reading
> > tokens and such (sort of like chip8), but it would be oriented towards
> > doing cool things :). Another idea that'll never get done...
>
> Quite true. But not an original idea. Anyone here remember HAL?
Rather than making a new programming language, I'd just like to see someone
make a Basic Assembly Library (BAL? AAK!) or something that adds extra
commands to BASIC like inverted text, variable pic size, and the savior of
the 89/92, Indirection. Just an indirection library would be incredibly
helpful...
Follow-Ups: