Re: A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?

Re: A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
• From: warhorse <warhorse@bellatlantic.net>
• Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 18:40:30 -0400
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• References: <2e00e0a7.2458e06b@aol.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

Here's another:
ld hl, here
call _puts

here:
    .db 196,"=3.14159",0

how am I supposed to know 196 is pi? I need a list, man!! BTW. ASM studio lists
some of the equates, but there is so much not there..

RSidetrack@aol.com wrote:

> I agree with the lists of what each function does.  I have the problem of
> understanding what does what, I mean, what does $4013 mean and stuff like
> that.  The tutorials are usually not enough, the tutorials and a list would
> be just perfect.

• Re: A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
• From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>

• Re: A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
• From: RSidetrack@aol.com

• Prev: A86: Recruiting Programmers
• Next: Re: A86: Re: [OT] A TI compiler - Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread