Re: A86: Re: Re: Assembly

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Re: Assembly
From: David Thomas <david_hd@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 22:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

I think that it might be wiser to go
TI-Basic->C->Assembly, because there is a lot of stuff
you don't have to do (and/or can't do) in TI-Basic,
that you have to/can do in assembly. Also, in C you
have to work MUCH more with memory, so I think that
that would be a better course.

--- BlAsTo1414@aol.com wrote:
> 
> how about one that is aimed at people who know
> ti-basic?  that would be 
> easier b/c you could have certian asm funtions
> funtions supported by basic 
> functions.  (i.e. [ld  hl,title][call puts] would be
> represented by a basic 
> Disp Variablename)    depending on how many people
> are wanting to program 
> games, someone could write one aimed at game
> programmers who know ti-basic.  
> any others input on this one?
> 
> << Would a very basic tutorial for Assembly Studio
> 86 aimed at people who know
>  no programming help? >>
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Prev: Re: A86: Re: Re: Assembly
Next: A86: Game idea... marginally off topic...
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread