A86: Re: Assembly

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: A86: Re: Assembly
From: Nicolas P Zagorin <ziggy2282@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 22:11:01 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
References: <4260f7a0.244e7be9@aol.com> <19990420.212105.8942.3.V8r@juno.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


I say,instead of rewriting a whole other compiler, why don't we make a
more beginner friendly programming include.  If anyonne has ever used 85
assembly, the syntax is really easy to grasp.  Perhaps if we made some
custom call routines to do harder stuff, and also map out a new syntax
for the existing includes.  Maybe call it bAsm (beginner's asm??)  I
dunno, but I definitely think that would be easier than coding a whole
new compiler, it's a lot more work.  Any other ideas??

~Nick  

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

References:

Re: A86: Re: Re: Assembly

From: BlAsTo1414@aol.com

A86: Re: Assembly

From: Chris Magill <v8r@juno.com>

Prev: A86: Re: Assembly
Next: A86: Re Assembly
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread