RE: A86: Re: kirk meyer's ti-94

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

RE: A86: Re: kirk meyer's ti-94


Yeah, *I* deleted the comment.  It was very obviously fake.  :)  In fact, I
got rid of a couple useless threads following that news item, including the
whole stupid Mac vs. PC thread.

--
Nathan Haines <nhaines@ticalc.org>
   Help Mail, FAQ, Other Sites Manager, and News Editor
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:owner-assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of
> jdaomteys@juno.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 1999 9:42 PM
> To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A86: Re: kirk meyer's ti-94
>
>
>
> ticalc deleted the post anyway, so I guess it was a fake :)
>
> --James
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 1999 21:51:06 -0500 "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
> writes:
> >
> >Kirk Meyer didn't post that.  Until ticalc.org starts posting IP
> >numbers
> >with the messages, no one will know.  Just like email...you can fake
> >all the
> >user information, but you can't fake the servers in the header.
> >
> >The TI-94 idea is very possible.  People have done that and more on
> >the HPs,
> >with much less ram and an over 10 year old 4 Mhz processor.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> over on the discussion board at ticalc.org at the very bottom kirk
> >meyer
> >> himself has posted that his ti-94 joke was only an april fools
> >joke.
> >>
> >> I would certainly believe this as it just didn't seem possible.
> >>
> >> The only question I have is whether or not it was the real kirk
> >meyer.
> >> Anyone could have posted that message and put in his name.
> >>
> >> Can anyone confirm that this is true...
> >>
> >> If so it most certainly was a good april fool's joke.  the best one
> >yet
> >I'd
> >> say.
> >
> >
> >
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
> or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
Follow-Ups: References: