Re: A86: 86-Z80 assembly language

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: 86-Z80 assembly language
From: Andy Johnson <prjohnson@utahlinx.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1998 15:53:21 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <c5dc6cf.35eb6efb@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


At 11:50 PM 8/31/98 EDT, you wrote:
>
>> I've tried C++ but gave up after a while
>
>Since C++ was written so that people didn't have to code in ASM,
>you'll for sure find ASM even harder.  You will probably give up on
>it too.

That's not really true.  I gave up on C++ but found ASM much easier.
Controling things directly without muddling about in useless redundancy and
odd syntax is much easier for me.  Anyway, I don't think we should *ever*
discourage a potential ASM programmer, who knows, Cliff might just become
another genius.
--
Andy Johnson <prjohnson@utahlinx.com>

References:

Re: A86: 86-Z80 assembly language

From: TGaArdvark@aol.com

Prev: A86: hex running
Next: Re: A86: auto adjust
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread