Re: A86: TI86 Rom

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: TI86 Rom
From: InFuZeD <zoneti@home.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 07:52:44 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <19981031.001508.-110989.5.rabidcow@juno.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


I'm not sure, but I believe these posts are off topic. If you want to
talk about making a debug for the 86 ( which would be very usefull ),
please email each other about it. I've got like 15 posts that don't
really make sense to me. Just my thoughts.

-InFuZeD

p.s. Lets get back to asm questions please =)

Joshua J Seagoe wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 30 Oct 1998 11:45:25 +0100 Jimmy =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5rdell?=
> <yarin@acc.umu.se> writes:
> >
> >At 20:27 1998-10-29 -0800, you wrote:
> >>
> >>I recently performed an experiment;
> >>I dumped my calcs rom using one of the many rom dump programs
> >>available for use w/ emulators. I then ran a disassembler on the rom
> >>to see if I could get the asm for it.
> >>
> >>It seems to have worked ... the only problem being that I now have
> >>about 6mb of asm code to wade through. If anyone want's to give me a
> >>hand, E-mail me and I will gladly share some of the work.
> >
> >I haven't understand that point really in disassembling the whole
> >source
> >at once. Imho, an interactive disassembler is much better (like old
> >debug for DOS :) ) because then you can jump more freely between
> >address without losing yourself.
> 
> it's nice to have commented code, that way you don't have to figure out
> the same routine 20 times.  i personally prefer a combination of both,
> depending on what you're trying to do.
> 
> -josh
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
> or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

References:

Re: A86: TI86 Rom

From: rabidcow@juno.com (Joshua J Seagoe)