RE: A86: missing shell version???

To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: A86: missing shell version???
From: "Nathan Haines" <stuntman@jps.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 18:41:16 -0700
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3623E893.E46C6BD2@earthlink.net>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


Hehe, he has Rascall v0.96 for the same reason I have Usgard v1.6... we're
betatesters.  ;)

Although, I wouldn't mind having the beta version of Rascall. :)  Especially
if it'll emulate Usgard well enough to run XC-1701 II.  ASE won't do it...
but Rascall .9 will run it.  However, when you quit XC II, the calc locks
up.  >:(

-----
Stuntman (Nathan Haines) - ICQ UIN#: 2157863
http://table.jps.net/~stuntman/nathan.html
QuickBASIC/Visual BASIC/TI-BASIC programmer (just your basic programmer)
President of Stuntworks - http://stuntworks.home.ml.org/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:owner-assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of VasquezJara
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 4:56 PM
> To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: A86: missing shell version???
>
> I only see .9 in the ticalc archives. and the same thing in files

References:

A86: missing shell version???

From: VasquezJara <vasquezjara@earthlink.net>