Re: A86: Re: Creating distinct random-integer.....flame....getkey

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A86: Re: Creating distinct random-integer.....flame....getkey


first of all...if you had noticed, all the BASIC commands throughout the 
calculators are BASICally the SAME!!!!

I'm on this list to get maybe...hmmm...ASM info.  I know they aren't 
completely the same, but they can easily be ported.  I hate to be 
flamed, and I know how many people on the many lists hate me, and that's 
why I said "I don't know if this was answered..."  Now, I put a set of 
code on this list that I kept to myself for awhile.  I haven't noticed 
anyone else making the same code.  All I see are people making stupid 
"randomize and check the current" code, which is slow and inefficient.

I was playing this solitaire game that had one of those systems in it.  
It will display the card it was randomizing, and on the last card, it 
would stay that way for a minute...HELLO!!!  The code I gave is the same 
speed throughout the whole randomizing process, and in fact, the whole 
process (using 52 cards) is about 10 seconds.

{If you will, I'll answer the Basic questions. }
Ok, fine, maybe you are the GOD of all BASIC questions, and I should be 
on my knees in front of you begging your forgiveness.  Yeah, and I'm the 
Zar of Russia.  You CAN answer the BASIC questions, but I don't look at 
all the "Re:" to mail.  I just keep the original and the first reply, 
and if the reply wasn't up to MY standards, I answer after everyone 
else.

{Your answer is completely incorrect.}
??  Actually, that code has worked for many of my programs.  It may not 
work for the 86, but if you show me the commands, I could rewrite the 
code for the stupid calculator.  I won't even need you to tell me what 
the commands syntax is, I'll just KNOW it because if you would open your 
eyes, you would see they use the same.

{If you don't have an 86, wtf are you on an 86 list?}
I said it before, but I'll just come up with more reasons.  Why buy an 
86 when I have a 92, 83, and 85?  The extra money I do get, I spend on 
my beautiful woman (taking her out on dates, jewelry, and being truely 
in-love with a HUMAN), not on another calculator which just repeats the 
processes of my other calculators.  

{After someone answers a question, please don't post 10-20 more replys}
But if you don't do that, you don't get variety and conflicts...DUH.  If 
you say "don't post 10-20 more replys," then why did you just post 
another one?  What's it matter to you if you get another "Re:" mail.  
It's not like stopping me from doing it is going to stop everyone else.

{-InFuZeD " Hmmm....Donuts... "}
Infuzed?  with your ass?  To reply and tell people not to reply so many 
times, it sounds like you're a chump.  The list was made to help people, 
my last reply WAS to help the person...where's your help in this 
message?  Donuts?? are you a fat lazy bum who has nothing better to do 
with your life, and you got hungry at the last second of your message?  
I mean, I could've come up with something better than "donuts," 
especially in a flame.

Not to contradict myself about helping...I'll place a little code, to 
help someone out there:

a=a list of key presses
b=a list of returns

dimL(a)->f          unless it's dim or lngth
0->g
lbl over
0->c
while c=0
 getky->c
endwhile
for d,1,f
 if a(d)=c:then:
  d->e
  f->d
  1->g
 end               unless it's endif
end                unless it's endfor
if g=0:goto over
b(e)

This code will stall execution until a key is pressed that is in "a" 
list and returns the association to that key in "b" list.  For example, 
if a={105,95} and b={0,1}, then the program will wait until either the 
ENTER or + key is pressed and returns 0 for ENTER and 1 for +.  I said 
before I didn't have an 86, so I made this code as simple as I could for 
portability.  It might be some help to someone out there.

-Rob

otps: does anyone here like Monty Python?



>From: "In FuZeD" <zone_ti@hotmail.com>
>To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: Re: A86: Re: Creating distinct random-integer lists using >ASM 
or BASIC
>Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1998 17:04:50 PDT
>Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

|>From: "Robert Caldwell" <rc_ware@hotmail.com>
|>To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
|>Subject: Re: A86: Re: Creating distinct random-integer lists using ASM 
or BASIC
|>Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1998 15:48:40 PDT
|>Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
|>
|>
|>people sure do like to make things hard.
|>
|>I don't know if anyone else has this same answer, but here's the way I 
|>would do it (I don't own an 86, so I'm basing this on 92):

>If you will, I'll answer the Basic questions. Your answer is 
>completely 
>incorrect. One question, If you don't have an 86, wtf are you on an >86 
>list? Jeez. After someone answers a question, please don't post 10->20 
>more replys =)

>-InFuZeD " Hmmm....Donuts... "

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Follow-Ups: