RE: A86: ROM Images (legal battle thread)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A86: ROM Images (legal battle thread)
That would be section 107 not 1.107. :)
--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
File Archives, News, Features, and HTML
the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
On Thu, 19 Nov 1998, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
>
> At 04:41 AM 11/19/98 +0100, you wrote:
> >Could you provide us with a link to this so called copyright law that the
> >Supreme Court upheld? That way, we can all read it and judge for
> >ourselves.
>
> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/
>
> Section 1.107
>
> >--
> >Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> > File Archives, News, Features, and HTML
> > the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
> >
> >On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> At 06:15 PM 11/17/98 -0400, you wrote:
> >> >>Frankly, your arguments would never hold up in a court room. The facts
> >> >>are that the TI ROM is copyrighted material and you can't distribute it.
> >> >>
> >> >Right. You _can_ make a copy for personal use, but without TI's
> permission,
> >> >it's illegal to distribute it for any purpose.
> >>
> >> How do you know that my arguments won't hold up in a court room? They are
> >> sound arguments legally based on the national copyright law. Only the
> >> Supreme Court could possibly overrule "programming research" by a change in
> >> the law. I have proven my point in many various ways and I seem to have
> >> come out on top every single time. I have replied to every e-mail that has
> >> been sent and still proven "programming research" and the distribution of
> >> ROM images under the copyright law exception to be completely and utterly
> >> legal. I may have seemed redundant at times, but that was to emphasize my
> >> point. You have all presented very good arguments against "programming
> >> research." However, I wouldn't have initially replied if I hadn't thought
> >> the whole thing through in the first place.
>
>
> Thomas J. Hruska -- thruska@tir.com
> Shining Light Productions -- "Meeting the needs of fellow programmers"
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504
> http://shinelight.home.ml.org
>
References: