Re: A86: sorry again: sc2k

To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A86: sorry again: sc2k
From: "Matt2000" <matt2000@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 06:09:15 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


>> ... Aurora may or may not use program write back (I don't know).
>> You can use ASE because it doesn't do program writeback. I think shells
>> like Iridus and Rascall will work too (but not too sure about Rascall)
...
>
>A good idea for a new shell or a new version might be a flag.  If the
>program sets it before it finishes, it gets written back.  If it does not,
>it does not.  Or maybe vice-versa.  Dunno.  Just a thought.  The truth
>is, the way the shells that don't do writeback are made, it would take
>a lot of rewriting and another 500 bytes or so of mem to add write-
>back.  Feel free to ruminate.

Not 500 bytes. It would just call _FINDSYM and use some ABSolute addressing
block moves to copy from _asm_exec_ram to the correct program's absoulute
address

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: sorry again: sc2k

From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>

Prev: Re: A86: Questions on Port 3, calc on, off, APD, etc
Next: Re: A86: Questions on Port 3, calc on, off, APD, etc
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread