Re: A86: sorry again: sc2k

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: sorry again: sc2k
From: TGaArdvark@aol.com
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 04:12:11 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


> ... Aurora may or may not use program write back (I don't know).
> You can use ASE because it doesn't do program writeback. I think shells
> like Iridus and Rascall will work too (but not too sure about Rascall) ...

A good idea for a new shell or a new version might be a flag.  If the
program sets it before it finishes, it gets written back.  If it does not,
it does not.  Or maybe vice-versa.  Dunno.  Just a thought.  The truth
is, the way the shells that don't do writeback are made, it would take
a lot of rewriting and another 500 bytes or so of mem to add write-
back.  Feel free to ruminate.

Prev: Re: A86: Questions on Port 3, calc on, off, APD, etc
Next: Re: A86: Questions on Port 3, calc on, off, APD, etc
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread