Re: A86: directories
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: directories
Beats me, but you'd have to if you want a new var type ... unless you somehow took
over one of the system variable types.
I guess you would have to do something clever with [sqrt]PARSE.
Kirk Meyer wrote:
> and how, might i ask, do you integrate your own _findsym into the TI-86
> OS!?!?
>
> Dux Gregis wrote:
> >
> > David Phillips wrote:
> >
> > > At 02:45 AM 5/17/98 -0400, you wrote:
> > > >David Phillips wrote:
> > > >> I don't really think it could be done easily. You'd have to create a new
> > > >> VAT/FAT table to account for directories, and the real VAT wouldn't reflect
> > > >> the new one.
> > > >No you wouldn't. You can just take advantage of the unused byte.
> > >
> > > You'd have to have some list for multiple vars with the same name.
> >
> > You could do this: all variables with 01 in the unused byte belong to the same
> > directory, all with 02 in the unused byte belong to the same directory, etc. It
> > really doesn't matter because you would be writing your own _findsym.
>
> --
>
> =====================================
> = =
> = Kirk Meyer (mailto:_@ibm.net) =
> = http://www.bigfoot.com/~kirkmeyer =
> = =
> = "Set your affection on things =
> = above, not on things on the =
> = earth." Colossians 3:2 =
> = =
> =====================================
References: