Re: A86: Bit Shifts

Re: A86: Bit Shifts

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A86: Bit Shifts
• From: Kirk Meyer <_@ibm.net>
• Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 16:39:59 -0600
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• References: <d0a10a3f.355a1e74@aol.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

yes, but i think (i don't have the timings w/ me) that 'sla a' is
slower. people like to use 'add a,a' because it's more clear as to what
it does.

BIOSERRORS wrote:
> 
> Doesn't
>         sla             a
> have the same effect as
>         add             a,a
> ?

-- 

=====================================
=                                   =
=   Kirk Meyer (mailto:_@ibm.net)   =
= http://www.bigfoot.com/~kirkmeyer =
=                                   =
=   "Set your affection on things   =
=    above, not on things on the    =
=      earth."  Colossians 3:2      =
=                                   =
=====================================

• Re: A86: Bit Shifts
• From: David Phillips <electrum@tfs.net>

• A86: Bit Shifts
• From: BIOSERRORS <BIOSERRORS@aol.com>

• Prev: Re: A86: Re: Re: Hard Locking the calc
• Next: Re: A86: cones
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread