Re: A86: Re: rom calls

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: rom calls
From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 19:36:37 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <006701bd7b24$d4563320$014103cf@joemama.minot> <3.0.5.16.19980511072658.2c177ada@mailserver.netcarrier.com> <35575557.DDC85BEE@eden.rutgers.edu> <35578758.91CC4F0B@mindspring.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org




Stephen Hicks wrote:

> Am I correct in thinking that this OP stack is basically like a second stack?
> That you can push and pop words to and from?  That out of the way, is there any
> way that sqrtPARSE could return to the parser where it left off rather than going
> where it does normally (i.e. alternate return or something).  I've tried jumping
> to several places from sqrtPARSE (page 3, $5851 for one) and it never works
> correctly - how do you specify an alternate return address?

There's nothing wrong with where it returns to; it's a matter of reading the value
form the right place and putting it into op1 with that flag set.

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: Re: rom calls

From: Stephen Hicks <shicks@mindspring.com>

References:

A86: Re: rom calls

From: "Trey Jazz" <joemama@minot.com>

Re: A86: Re: rom calls

From: Grams Family <grams@netcarrier.com>

Re: A86: Re: rom calls

From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>

Re: A86: Re: rom calls

From: Stephen Hicks <shicks@mindspring.com>