Re: A86: Re: rom calls

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: rom calls
From: Stephen Hicks <shicks@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 19:05:11 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <006801bd7d0d$f4908240$02f4ffd0@matt>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

Hmm..  That wasn't very english :-)  i think most of the effort here is going
towards parse, so t\we don't know too much about the others.  parse is very
powerful, though.  i am thinking about making a program with will take
advantage of parse (once we figure it out :-) and will add an extra variable
type that will have an extra byte keeping track of sig figs...  that might be
tough but i'll work on it :-)

Matt2000 wrote:

> >That was almost as easy to understand as the raw assembly code. ;-)
>
> An English explanation often helps.. I wish people could write explanations
> about that for the other (sqrt) routines, the
> parser and asap stuff too.. Need tutorials on these issues
>
> -Matt

--
Stephen Hicks
mailto:shicks@mindspring.com
ICQ:5453914
IRC/AIM:Kupopo
Hopemage:http://www.mindspring.com/~shicks/

References:

Re: A86: Re: rom calls

From: "Matt2000" <matt2000@gte.net>

Prev: Re: A86: simple math optimization
Next: Re: A86: Re: rom calls
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread