Re: A86: An idea for an ASM program
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: An idea for an ASM program
More like this I guess, name the instruction something like, "Sound("
without the quote marks. Then in the parenthesis put some kind of
parameters for the type of sound, say maybe pitch and duration.
-----Original Message-----
From: Trey Jazz <joemama@minot.com>
To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, May 03, 1998 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: A86: An idea for an ASM program
>
>its weird how the sound works...you gotta first send like hilo to the link
>port, then wait however many counts with a djnz loop then send a lohi to
the
>link port and then wait however many counts again in a djnz loop, seems
very
>strange to me that you have to loop after you send the signal to the link
>port instead of having the signal to the port inside the loop
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
>To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, May 03, 1998 7:05 PM
>Subject: Re: A86: An idea for an ASM program
>
>
>>
>>Do you mean something like this: Sound x , where x is a different sound?
>>Wouldn't be too hard. I would do it if I knew how to send sound out the
>>link port.
>>
>>Kevin Buck wrote:
>>>
>>> I know that the following idea I would like to introduce to this list
may
>be
>>> a bit hard to understand, or even totally difficult to do, but I think
it
>>> would be very neat to have.
>>>
>>> Why doesn't someone develop an ASM program that added an instruction to
>the
>>> I/O menu in the basic program editor that when it is executed, it sends
a
>>> signal to the link port and creates a beep if a speaker is connected.
It
>>> would allow for sound in basic programing, I feel sure that many people
>>> would be very grateful for it. Although, it would be very difficult I
>feel
>>> sure.
>>
>
>
Follow-Ups: