Re: A86: Re: Down+Left

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Down+Left
From: Grams Family <grams@netcarrier.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 20:51:00
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <354A6580.4C08AB86@eden.rutgers.edu>
References: <ae104f6b.3548e3f5@aol.com> <354A277C.ACF36A0C@bellsouth.net> <354A3955.BBD8012F@eden.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


At 08:14 PM 5/1/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>> Maybe we could rewrite the interrupt using that pop hl method.  That
>> could serve as the "patch" people were saying couldn't happen.
>
>The easiest way I can think of to patch it, is to call 66h and then fix
>the getkey if down and left are pressed.  I have no idea what getkey
>looks like, or how to fix it ... can someone tell me about how getkey
>reads multiple keypresses?

The calc doesn't read multiple keypresses. The routine to check the
keyboard returns a 0 (no key) if more than one key is pressed. (I think)

--Joshua

References:

From:

Re: A86: Re: Down+Left

From: John Malluck <malluck@bellsouth.net>

Re: A86: Re: Down+Left

From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>

Re: A86: Re: Down+Left

From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>