Re: A86: Re: Down+Left

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Down+Left
From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 18:16:38 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <002801bd754c$27446540$f8f3ffd0@matt>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

I was just looking at the rest of the interrupt.  I never realized how
terrifically enormous the rest of the interrupt really is.  But that
doesn't matter too much ... the keypress stuff is near the beginning, so
we can just fix up that part and use jps to let the interrupt finish
itself.

Matt2000 wrote:
> 
> >Maybe we could rewrite the interrupt using that pop hl method.  That
> >could serve as the "patch" people were saying couldn't happen.
> 
> You mean rewrite the keypad handler? Like copy everything from 60h and
> beyond that would normally be executed and put it in our asm routine and put
> it in the user interrupt, and then fix and optimize TI's keypad handling
> routine? So when you call the user interrupt it goes right back to 38h and
> bypasses TI's routines... Wow, interesting idea
> 
> -Matt
> http://www.dogtech.com/cybop/ti86/

References:

Re: A86: Re: Down+Left

From: "Matt2000" <matt2000@gte.net>

Prev: Re: A86: Loading data from a "variable" address. . .
Next: Re: A86: interrupts
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread