Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)

Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)
• From: Klukan <renegade@bmt.net>
• Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 06:10:08 -0700
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980324101105.27163A-100000@S-98-47.resnet.oh io-state.edu> <3.0.5.32.19980321023750.008fa3a0@mail.acc.umu.se> <3.0.3.32.19980325041757.010b1b00@popd.ix.netcom.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

David Ellsworth wrote:

> I *would* be terribly curious to see what people were saying on the
> Calc-TI
> list around the time the original discovery was made (the list did
> exist
> back then, didn't it? Unfortunately, Deja News doesn't go back that
> far).

If I'm not mistaken, TICALC.ORG maintains archives of the CALC-TI list.

-Jeremy

• Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)
• From: David Ellsworth <davidell@ix.netcom.com>
• Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)
• From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>

• From:
• Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)
• From: Jimmy =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5rdell?= <yarin@acc.umu.se>
• Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)
• From: David Ellsworth <davidell@ix.netcom.com>

• Prev: Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)
• Next: Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread