Re: A86: thoughts about the 89 test legality...

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: thoughts about the 89 test legality...
From: Stephen Hicks <shicks@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 14:14:36 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <006901bd4fd0$4d6812e0$5504dacd@joemama.minot>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


the IR port only work at extremely close proximity, you'd need to have the
other person's calculator right on your desk for it to work correctly!

Trey Jazz wrote:

> hehe thats stupid....why not just say you gotta cover up the 92s qwerty pad
> except for x and make that legal too...duh, havent they ever heard of
> RIIIIIP...SEND ANSWER :)
>
> >I'm thinking the HP48 does have an ir port.  And they are allowed on the
> >ACT's.  I took them a couple of months ago and the lady said that any
> >calculators with an ir port must have the port covered with opaque tape.



--
Stephen Hicks
mailto:shicks@mindspring.com
ICQ:5453914
IRC:Kupopo

References:

Re: A86: thoughts about the 89 test legality...

From: "Trey Jazz" <joemama@minot.com>

Prev: A86:another question
Next: A86: Re: TI-89 -- l'd like to make programs for it
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread