A86: TI's ROM Sux

A86: TI's ROM Sux

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: A86: TI's ROM Sux
• From: Bryan Rittmeyer <bryanr@flash.net>
• Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 08:45:16 -0400
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• References: <35910A3C.3B5DFE34@flash.net> <19980624.152444.4574.2.rabidcow@juno.com> <359198C5.F43FFDEF@mindspring.com> <19980624.174025.5006.2.rabidcow@juno.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

rabidcow@juno.com wrote:

> really?  tell ti, they used add

I really wonder about the quality of some of their ROM coders...
Half the people on the list could do a much better job. They use
jp in some of the link port code to move PC up/down less than
10 instructions!

Was the 8X ROM written in C as well? I believe the 92 ROM was.
Then again, if they have a whole ROM chip to play with they
can waste as damn much as they want.

-- 
Bryan Rittmeyer
mailto:bryanr@flash.net
http://www.bridges.edu/horizon/

• re: A86: TI's ROM Sux
• From: Pat Milheron <pmilheron@ti.com>

• A86: can one program be on two pages?
• From: Bryan Rittmeyer <bryanr@flash.net>
• Re: A86: can one program be on two pages?
• From: rabidcow@juno.com
• Re: A86: can one program be on two pages?
• From: Stephen Hicks <shicks@mindspring.com>
• Re: A86: can one program be on two pages?
• From: rabidcow@juno.com

• Prev: Re: A86: calls: important vars & 24-bit ptr
• Next: re: A86: TI's ROM Sux
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread