Re: A86: Re: PutSprite

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: PutSprite
From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 21:07:33 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <001201bd8db4$50d4e080$fdf4ffd0@matt>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org




Matt2000 wrote:

> >No offense, but I think he wants strictly 8x8, not a variable sized
> >routine.  I am also interested in a strictly 8x8 routine, since it would be
> >faster and not require storing the size with the data.
>
> I dont want to start a flame here, but I do want to point out a few things
> that people notice.  If one day you ask for an
> 8 by 8 sprite routine and the next day you comment on "how easy" it would be
> to write a 3D video game come one, who
> are you fooling? Even a slow 3d game would be hard.  Now I wasn't quite
> bright enough to figure out my own PutSprite, but I did learn line by line
> how both the FindPixel and PutSprite routine works and put them together to
> make my own PutSprite. Then I noticed how easy it would be to modify the 8
> by X to 16 by X sprites. I give a well commented version of a PutSprite.

Could you repost it (or is it on your web site?) ..  My mail doesn't go back
that far

References:

Re: A86: Re: PutSprite

From: "Matt2000" <matt2000@gte.net>