Re: A86: Re: Another new Program
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: Another new Program
nah thats still too easy man. all u gotta do is make a program in like basic
or any other language for that matter and find the common multiplier of
corresponding items in the matrices.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Kassing <the_chronomancer@hotmail.com>
To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Saturday, January 10, 1998 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Another new Program
>
> I know what you guys mean, a table would be a lot easier meathod VAR
>storrage, but it does seriously lack in security. Too bad there is not
>a way to edit lock matrices (of cource that wold defeat the purpose of
>useing them!) But maybe possible cheaters could be slowed down; because
>there is nothing I hate worse than thinking of someone wasteing all the
>time I woud spend writeing a program. (not that I wouldent ocassionally
>do it myself) I'm thinking of a quick incryption process that should be
>easy to use.
>
>picture this as multiply it by and this is
> your data matrix: this key: what you get:
> [4,3,5,3] [2,3,4,4] [44,50,44,43]
> [2,6,6,1] X [3,2,4,2] = [44,46,46,40]
> [5,2,4,5] [3,4,2,3] [48,55,46,46]
> [6,7,3,9] [4,4,2,2] [78,80,76,65]
>
> Now anyone who looks at the data finds strange numbers has no idea
>what is up. To get your correct data back you just multiply that by the
>inverse of the key and your back in buisness. You can use a lot more
>complicated numbers to strengthen the code; but the more complicated you
>get, the slower it may become. (a reall tough code would be to use
>various calculator functions, and a key that will change itself
>periodicly.) Useing this would require areas in the program to check if
>the program was exited early(BREAK), and adjust itself accordingly to
>prevent data corruption.
>
> Ken Kassing
> the_chronomancer@hotmail.com
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>