Re: A86: Shell Name
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Shell Name
isnt that a lil too redundant (powerwise)
-----Original Message-----
From: TurboSoft@aol.com <TurboSoft@aol.com>
To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Wednesday, February 25, 1998 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Shell Name
>
>In a message dated 98-02-23 20:40:19 EST, you write:
>
><< Myself and a friend are writing a shell for the 86, as some of you are
> already aware. However, we have run into a major problem and would like
> you to give us a little help. Our problem: We need a name for our
> shell. Currently, we are calling it SuperShell86 (which is kind of a
> stupid name). Please send any suggestions you may have to this address
> or to the list. We will consider all submissions and select one (unless
> they are all as bad as SuperShell86!). The person who has the best name
> will get credit in the program. All others will receive credit in the
> included documentation file. Thank you for your support!
>
> -Jeremy Klukan and Will Nickisch >>
>
>
>SuperTurboShell
>