Re: A86: Re: Shell Name

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Shell Name
From: Klukan <renegade@bmt.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 22:35:01 -0700
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980224000257.25401A-100000@nuklear.steelcity.net>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

nuke@bayside.net wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Matt2000 wrote:
>
> >
> > If the shell resembles a GUI
> >
> > X-Shell86 (named after X-windows)
>
> i thought i harped on you about this before? :)
> X! X! X!
>
> www.opengroup.org, home of X. there is no mention of "X-Windows"
> anywhere
> on that site :)
>

No Fighting!!!  I wanted suggestions, not contraversy!  Besides, I
myself have seen X-Windows mentioned quite a bit.  I think they (whoever
they may be) are referring to ANY version of Windows (generic term).
Just stop arguing.  This list is for the sharing of ideas and
information, not for arguing over things like X-Windows.  Just because
Matt suggested X-Shell86 doesn't mean we'll use it.  We could change it
to Shell86x or something similar.  He just got the idea from the
mentioned X-Windows.  Understood??

-Jeremy

References:

Re: A86: Re: Shell Name

From: nuke@bayside.net

Prev: Re: A86: Re: Shell Name
Next: A86: Re: Need a little help with these ROM calls...
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread