Re: A86: very very odd

To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A86: very very odd
From: "Trey Jazz" <joemama@minot.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 21:09:10 -0600
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


yeah exactly...dont deny it youve gone searching for them bill. and also the
rom calls that we have ARENT enough thats mostly why there is this list so
we can SHARE the rom calls that we find and teach others how to use them.
this helps TI and especially pat so they dont have to spend their time on us
who buy their calcs and deserve such help.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, February 15, 1998 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: A86: very very odd


>
>Have you made anything in which all your calls were documented?
>
>Bill N. wrote:
>
>> Ekauq@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> > >TI has released plenty of info to write a game.There are far too many
calls
>> > to
>> > >document, and what is documented so far is enough. Remember, they made
the 86
>> > >for educational purposes, and the OP numbers are well documented.
>> >
>> > well any other language like c is well documented and i can say that it
has
>> > more commands than the 86 has rom calls and businesses like microsoft
and
>> > borland do other things besides just concentrate on c so i think ti
could
>> > spare a few people for the project of finding and defining every rom
call on
>> > the 86
>>
>> 1. You dont need every rom call, you already have enough.
>>
>> 2. TI gave us assembly support because they were considerate.  Its not
like anyone
>> here is developing a commercial application.
>>
>> Bill
>
>
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: very very odd

From: "Bill N." <b.nagel@usa.net>