Re: A86: Shells

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Shells
From: ajk22@juno.com (Andrew J Kalafut)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 21:45:09 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <9b8b5190.35e73c53@aol.com>>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org



On Fri, 28 Aug 1998 19:25:07 EDT TGaArdvark@aol.com writes:
>
>> In my humble opinion, Rascall doesn't have a graphic user interface at
all.
>> It's features are more intuitive, and it has that "hidden" folder.
>
>Most of these "features" are just a waste of space, IE the "hidden"
folder.
>This is why I use ASE 0.9, which doesn't have folders, program deletion,
>or any of that other wasted memory.
>
No folders?  The only reasons why anyone needs a shell for the 86 is for
folders and for emulation.  Thats why all these small shells designed to
just list programs without taking much space are a waste of time.

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: Shells

From: Kirk Meyer <kirkmeyer@bigfoot.com>

References:

From:

Prev: A86: Graph Screen
Next: Re: A86: Graph Screen
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread