Re: A86: Simple TI-85 Question

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Simple TI-85 Question
From: David Phillips <electrum@tfs.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 00:57:06 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <35CE925E.5BC0@busprod.com>
References: <007f01bdc414$86a210c0$fef4ffd0@gte.net.gte.net>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


How hard is it to line it up?  He included the .org directive to line up
the Bit Table.  But, IMHO, does a few t-states really matter when it comes
to FindPixel?  You call it once (at most) for PutSprite, and that's it.

At 11:25 PM 8/9/98 -0700, you wrote:
>
>Matt Johnson wrote:
>> Dan Eble, I believe, has a faster one on his web page.
>
>His is faster by 8 ticks but in IMHO it's not worth it cuz
>it has to be lined up so that it doesn't have to deal
>with 16-bit addressing only 8-bit.
>
>-- 
>Tercero	 --  Email: mailto:tercero@busprod.com
>
>"The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone;"
>			--Psalms 118:22
>"Everyone who falls on that stone will be broken to pieces,
>but he on whom it falls will be crushed."
>			--Luke 20:18
>

--
David Phillips
mailto:electrum@tfs.net
ICQ: 13811951
AOL/AIM: electrum32

References:

Re: A86: Simple TI-85 Question

From: "Matt Johnson" <matt2000@gte.net>

Re: A86: Simple TI-85 Question

From: Tercero <tercero@busprod.com>