Re: A86: Ticklish?

Re: A86: Ticklish?

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A86: Ticklish?
• From: Stephen Hicks <shicks@mindspring.com>
• Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 22:04:58 -0500
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• References: <35243BAE.BDE60DE1@eden.rutgers.edu> <35244966.EAF88616@eden.rutgers.edu> <35245001.41F677@mindspring.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

hehe.......  sorry for all these pointless posts to this thread...  it
doesn't work with asaptrig.

anyway, could you comment that?  how could you get the parser to
understand the new conversions?

Stephen Hicks wrote:

> That program doesn;t work on mine... :-(
>
> Dux Gregis wrote:
>
> >  Ahh.  I found a new method that's not much of a hack at all.  It
> > still doesn't work with 1.3, though.   ??
>
> --
> Stephen Hicks
> mailto:shicks@mindspring.com
> ICQ:5453914
> IRC:Kupopo



--
Stephen Hicks
mailto:shicks@mindspring.com
ICQ:5453914
IRC:Kupopo

• Re: A86: Ticklish?
• From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>

• A86: Ticklish?
• From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
• Re: A86: Ticklish?
• From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
• Re: A86: Ticklish?
• From: Stephen Hicks <shicks@mindspring.com>

• Prev: Re: A86: Ticklish?
• Next: Re: A86: Ticklish?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread