Re: A86: BASIC->ASM

Re: A86: BASIC->ASM

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A86: BASIC->ASM
• From: DEATH <joemama@minot.com>
• Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 22:58:36 -0500
• References: <3.0.1.32.19970915222528.008109b0@www.thethinker.com> <3.0.1.32.19970915231051.008109b0@www.thethinker.com> <3.0.1.32.19970915233334.008169a0@www.thethinker.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

Joseph Gaffney wrote:
> 
> At 10:34 PM 9/15/97 -0500, DEATH wrote:
> >
> >you can make .86p with hal?
> 
> Yup

hmm kinda looks like tic, does it run slower than asm
*thinkin about just using asm now* :)

• Re: A86: BASIC->ASM
• From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@thethinker.com>

• Re: A86: BASIC->ASM
• From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@thethinker.com>
• Re: A86: BASIC->ASM
• From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@thethinker.com>
• Re: A86: BASIC->ASM
• From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@thethinker.com>

• Prev: Re: A86: BASIC->ASM
• Next: Re: A86: BASIC->ASM
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread