Re: A86: Has anyone had luck with the par-link?

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Has anyone had luck with the par-link?
From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@thethinker.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 15:46:05 -0400
Cc: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <32ED0D61.33CBC8AA@nauticom.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970902142401.7708A-100000@S-98-190.resnet.ohio-state.edu> <3.0.1.32.19970902221158.007d9100@www.thethinker.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

At 03:17 PM 1/27/97 -0500, Chris wrote:
>section.  Although it says nothing in the manual, *.86* files show up

I was referring to link85xp, Cal 0.9 beta has 86 support (some)



|------------------------------------------------------------|
|         Joseph M. Gaffney - gaffney@thethinker.com         |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
|           "Tiocfaidh Ár Lá" / "Our Day Will Come"          |
|  "If Ignorance Is Bliss Then Knock The Smile Off My Face"  |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   The Creative Outlet                      |
|       http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/           |
|------------------------------------------------------------|

References:

Re: A86: Anyone else had problems with _puts?

From: Dan Eble <eble@cis.ohio-state.edu>

Re: A86: Has anyone had luck with the par-link?

From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@thethinker.com>

Re: A86: Has anyone had luck with the par-link?

From: Chris <chrisg@nauticom.net>

Prev: Re: A86: Has anyone had luck with the par-link?
Next: Re: A86: Has anyone had luck with the par-link?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread