Re: A86: 86 backup

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: 86 backup
From: nxt@juno.com (n X t)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:48:25 EDT
References: <971013212254_-193015594@emout12.mail.aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

On Mon, 13 Oct 1997 21:25:59 -0400 (EDT) Steve86Asm@aol.com writes:
>UrD14me wrote:
>Even if the software recieved/sent backups, there could be a byte (or
>something) that has the RAM version (or maybe not - it would just be a
>convenience) and then have either a tool in the software, or external
>software to convert RAM versions (it would be tough, probably, but I 
>don't
>see why it couldn't be done...)

again.. that would be better than not having backup.. heck having the
normal backup is better than nothing.. ti shouldn't worry about this
backup crap.. most ppl like i said b4.. use the bakcup to computer
feature.. for our own use
---
-nXt
   nxt@geocities.com     http://nxt.home.ml.org  OR:
   nxt@juno.com             
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Way/6521

References:

Re: A86: 86 backup

From: Steve86Asm@aol.com