Re: A86: Re: TI-Basic to asm

To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A86: Re: TI-Basic to asm
From: "Joshua Szmajda" <dariusa@erols.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 05:58:06 -0500
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

Here it is:  Straight from EggplFarms@aol.com

|To: calc-ti@lists.ppp.ti.com, assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org,
ti-basic@lists.ticalc.orgeggplfarms@aol.com, |TGaArdvark@aol.com,
Retupmoc7@hotmail.com
|Subject: A86: Here it is! HAL-IC!
|From: EggplFarms@aol.com
|Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 00:37:29 -0500 (EST)
|Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This is that letter you should read. :)
...
HAL and HAL-IC (HAL-In Calc). There are only a few simil-
arities between the two.
HAL-IC and your source:
...
The basic used in HAL-IC is identical to TI-
Basic in almost all respects. HAL-IC obviously offers more
control, faster execution, and a larger command base
through basic...
...
Q. Do I need to know any asm to use HAL-IC?
A. No, just TI-Basic.
...

Ok, it's not exactly TI-Basic, but they said it was nearly identical ;)


-----Original Message-----

From: TreyJazz <joemama@minot.com>
To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 03, 1997 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: TI-Basic to asm


>Joshua Szmajda wrote:
>>
>> Unlesss I'm mistaken, HAL-IC will use TI-Basic and asm.  developers
please
>> help?
>
>no it is some kinda psedo Qbasic-Ti-basic hybrid and asm
>