Re: A86: Re: Frogger

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Frogger
From: TreyJazz <joemama@minot.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 22:39:23 -0600
References: <199712030339.EAA12891@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> 
> >MCFLY, the dude said ANY suggestions and i think that sound would >be a
> >valid addition, as valid as adding sound to any game you thought >was
> >cool, right?
> 
> Well, then my suggestion is not to add sound.

i know but im saying that isnt the point. if frogger is good enough the
way it is (like you said) then why add anything to it? the whole reason
for a sequal is to add new, kewler stuff to a game so its better than
that last, sound wouldnt add THAT much memory as would longer levels
(and scrolling). dont mean to sound rude if it comes off that way

References:

Re: A86: Re: Frogger

From: "Mark Zimmerman" <gramdon@mail2.theonramp.net>

Prev: Re: A86: Re: Frogger
Next: A86: ASE
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread