Re: A86: shell conflicts

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: shell conflicts
From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@thethinker.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 10:17:47 -0400
Cc: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970828010438.12376B-100000@S-98-190.resnet.o hio-state.edu>
References: <3.0.1.32.19970827174942.007c2100@www.thethinker.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

At 01:05 AM 8/28/97 -0400, Dan Eble wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Joseph Gaffney wrote:
>
>> Or better yet, having the shell only write over memory specifically allowed
>> to it (ie: temp storage of all stuf in mem that wont be used by the shell,
>> but may be interrupted by it)
>
>Or better yet, wait for the info and do it the right way! :)

I plan on waiting for the info, but that will still be good to have anyway.
 There may be some information that can be overwritten, but that you dont
want the program to overwrite.


|------------------------------------------------------------|
|         Joseph M. Gaffney - gaffney@thethinker.com         |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
|           "Tiocfaidh Ár Lá" / "Our Day Will Come"          |
|  "If Ignorance Is Bliss Then Knock The Smile Off My Face"  |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   The Creative Outlet                      |
|       http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/           |
|------------------------------------------------------------|

References:

Re: A86: shell conflicts

From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@thethinker.com>

From:

Prev: A86: Fun with fonts
Next: Re: A86: Fonts
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread