Re: A86: FindPixel in 84 cycles and 19 bytes!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: FindPixel in 84 cycles and 19 bytes!
On Fri, 8 Aug 1997 ariwsi@juno.com wrote:
> ; this thing taking $8000-$BFFF shouldn't be a problem. If you really
> ; need a fast FindPixel, it might be worth it....
Oy! What about the 16 kilobytes of RAM that live in that range?
Wouldn't they would be unhappy to be wiped out of existence? =:o
--------
Dan Eble (mailto:eble@cis.ohio-state.edu)
(http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~eble)
References: